Successfully Pass MuleSoft MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE Exam: Valid MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE Exam Dumps

Successfully Pass MuleSoft MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE Exam: Valid MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE Exam Dumps

Are you looking for valid MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE exam dumps to help you successfully pass the MuleSoft MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE exam? If yes, then you have come to the right place! At ITPrepare, we provide valid dumps that help you pass the MuleSoft Certified Integration Architect – Level 1 MAINTENANCE exam with confidence and ease. ITPrepare provides you with the best opportunity to pass the MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE exam with minimal effort. With our valid exam dumps, you will be able to familiarize yourself with the topics and understand the concepts that will help you pass this certification exam with flying colors.

Choose to check the free MCIA-Level 1 MAINTENANCE demo questions first:

Page 1 of 4

1. An organization uses one specific CloudHub (AWS) region for all CloudHub deployments.

How are CloudHub workers assigned to availability zones (AZs) when the organization's

Mule applications are deployed to CloudHub in that region?

2. Customer has deployed mule applications to different customer hosted mule run times.

Mule applications are managed from Anypoint platform.

What needs to be configured to monitor these Mule applications from Anypoint monitoring and what sends monitoring data to Anypoint monitoring?

3. An organization has defined a common object model in Java to mediate the communication between different Mule applications in a consistent way. A Mule application is being built to use this common object model to process responses from a SOAP API and a REST API and then write the processed results to an order management system.

The developers want Anypoint Studio to utilize these common objects to assist in creating mappings for various transformation steps in the Mule application.

What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) and performant way to utilize these common objects to map between the inbound and outbound systems in the Mule application?

4. An API has been updated in Anypoint Exchange by its API producer from version 3.1.1 to 3.2.0 following accepted semantic versioning practices and the changes have been communicated via the API's public portal. The API endpoint does NOT change in the new version.

How should the developer of an API client respond to this change?

5. The AnyAirline organization's passenger reservations center is designing an integration solution that combines invocations of three different System APIs (bookFlight, bookHotel, and bookCar) in a business transaction. Each System API makes calls to a single database.

The entire business transaction must be rolled back when at least one of the APIs fails.

What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way to integrate these APIs in near real-time that provides the best balance of consistency, performance, and reliability?

6. An API implementation is being designed that must invoke an Order API which is known to repeatedly experience downtime. For this reason a fallback API is to be called when the Order API is unavailable.

What approach to designing invocation of the fallback API provides the best resilience?

7. An insurance company is implementing a MuleSoft API to get inventory details from the two vendors. Due to network issues, the invocations to vendor applications are getting timed-out intermittently. But the transactions are successful upon reprocessing

What is the most performant way of implementing this requirement?

8. Which Salesforce API is invoked to deploy, retrieve, create or delete customization information such as custom object definitions using a Mule Salesforce connector in a Mule application?

9. What aspects of a CI/CD pipeline for Mule applications can be automated using MuleSoft-provided Maven plugins?

10. An organization is designing an integration Mule application to process orders by submitting them to a back-end system for offline processing. Each order will be received by the Mule application through an HTTPS POST and must be acknowledged immediately. Once acknowledged, the order will be submitted to a back-end system. Orders that cannot be successfully submitted due to rejections from the back-end system will need to be processed manually (outside the back-end system).

The Mule application will be deployed to a customer-hosted runtime and is able to use an existing ActiveMQ broker if needed. The ActiveMQ broker is located inside the organization’s firewall. The back-end system has a track record of unreliability due to both minor network connectivity issues and longer outages.

What idiomatic (used for their intended purposes) combination of Mule application components and ActiveMQ queues are required to ensure automatic submission of orders to the back-end system while supporting but minimizing manual order processing?


Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *