Pass Your ISTQB Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) Exam with Latest CT-TAE Exam Materials

Eleanor2023-03-09T08:50:33+00:00

By Eleanor ISTQB, Test Automation Engineer CT-TAE, CT-TAE exam materials, CT-TAE exam questions, CT-TAE free demo 0 Comments

The ISTQB Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) exam is an excellent certification for testers who want to test their skills in the design, development, and maintenance of test automation solutions. If you are planning to take this exam, you need to have the best exam preparation materials to ensure your success. The CT-TAE exam materials of ITPrepare are an essential resource for candidates who want to pass their ISTQB Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) exam. With the latest exam questions and accurate answers, you can be sure that you have the best exam preparation materials to help you succeed. With 79 practice questions and answers, you can test your knowledge and identify areas where you need to focus your efforts.

ISTQB CT-TAE Exam Free Dumps Are Below For Learning First

Page 1 of 3

1. You are working as a TAE for a company who have been using a web test execution tool for a number of years. The tool has been used successfully on ten web applications in the past.

The company are developing a new web application which has a friendly User Interface, but the developers have used an object throughout the application which the tool is unable to recognise. As a result, you have no way of capturing the object or verifying the contents using the automation tool.

What is the first thing you should do about this problem?

See if the application can be run on a desktop and if the object can be recognised on the desktop by the tool.

Investigate whether the object can be recognised by other test execution tools in the market

Ask the developers to remove the object and replace it with some text fields

Ask the developers if they can change the object to something that can be recognised by the tool

2. 1.Which of the following BEST describes why it is important to separate test definition from test execution in a TAA?

It allows developing steps of the test process without being closely tied to the SUT interface.

It allow choosing different paradigms (e.g event-driven) for the interaction TAS and SUT

It allows specify test cases without being closely tied to the tool to run them against the SUT

It allows testers to find more defects on the SUT

3. The Test Automation Manager has asked you to provide a solution for collecting metrics from the TAS that measures code coverage every time the automated regression test pack is run. The metrics must be trend based to ensure that the scope of the regression test pack continues to reflect enhancements made to the SUT - coverage must not drop and should ideally increase. The solution must be as automated as possible to avoid unnecessary manual overheads and errors.

Which of the following approaches would BEST meet these requirements?

Test automation cannot measure code coverage for the SUT, only the code for the automation tools and scripts. The automated test cases would need to be run manually with a code coverage and reporting tool running in the background.

The automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run and add the figure to a new row in a pre-formatted Excel spreadsheet. You would then present the spreadsheet to stakeholders so they could look for changes in coverage.

The automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run, export the data to a pre-formatted Excel spreadsheet that automatically updates a trend analysis bar chart for you to distribute to stakeholders.

The automated testware would record the pass/fail rate of each regression test case, export the data to a pre-formatted Excel spreadsheet that automatically updates a trend analysis success rate bar chart and emails it to stakeholders.

4. What represents good practice when automating a manual regression test suite?

Test data shared between tests should, where feasible, be stored and accessed from a single source to avoid duplication or introduction of error.

All existing manual tests should be decomposed into several smaller automated tests to reduce functional overlap.

Remove inter-dependencies between tests to reduce automation failures and costly error analysis.

Once a manual test has been automated, execute it immediately to Identify whether it operates correctly.

5. You are working on a web-based application called Book Vault that allows people to upload books and order books. This application must be available on all major browsers.

You have been testing the application manually and management have asked you to consider automating some of the tests.

You have investigated a number of commercial and free tools which can automate tests at a web browser level and one tool in particular meets your requirements and you have implemented a trial version.

You have basic programming skills and the main goal is to automate a few functional tests to see if the tool is compatible with the application and can recognise the objects and controls.

Which scripting technique would be MOST suitable in this scenario in order to meet the objectives?

Structured scripting

Capture-replay scripting

Data-driven scripting

Model-based scripting

6. What is NOT a factor in considering when you are asked to ensure an effective transition from manual to automated tests?

Complexity to automate the manual test cases

Correctness of test data and test cases

The look and feel of the SUT

The controllability of the SUT

7. Consider a TAS deployed into production. The SUT is a web application and the test suite consists of a set of automated regression tests developed via GUI. A keyword-driven framework has been adopted for automating the regression tests. The tests are based on identification at low-levels of the web page components (e.g class indexes, tab sequence indexes and coordinates) in the next planned release the SUT will be subject to significant corrective maintenance (bug-fixes) and evolution (new features) Maintenance costs to update the test scripts should be as low as possible and the scripts must be highly reusable.

Which of the following statements is most likely to be TRUE?

The keyword-driven framework is not suitable, it would be better to adopt a structured-scripting approach

False positive errors are likely to occur when running the automated tests on the new releases without modifying the test

The total execution time of the automated regression test suite will decrease for each planned release.

The keyword-driven framework introduces a level abstraction that is too high and makes it difficult what really happens

8. You are working on a government system called “Making Tax Digital" or MTD for short. This system is being implemented to stop manual human input error and also to reduce fraudulent behaviour from companies when submitting their tax and VAT returns.

The key concept is that registered companies will need to use government recommended 3rd party software for their accounts and book keeping. These 3rd party applications will have a direct interface into the government's main system for transactions and submissions.

You have been using a test execution tool successfully on the project so far. and have implemented a basic “capture/replay” approach to scripting.

The management have been encouraged with the automation so far, but want the following objectives to be met:

* Test cases added easily

* Reduction in the amount of scripts and script duplication

* Reduction in maintenance costs

Which scripting technique would be MOST suitable in this scenario in order to meet the objectives?

Linear scripting

Structured scripting

Data-driven scripting

Keyword-driven scripting

9. You are implementing test automation for a project and you want to be able to generate test cases automatically using a series of test design tools which use a variety of test design techniques such as decision tables, pairwise testing and boundary value analysis.

You also want to generate test data automatically which can then be used by the tests.

Initially these tests will be run manually to verify their correctness and ultimately you want to include them in the test execution tool so that they can run unattended.

Which layer of the gTAA will be used to support the specification of the test cases and preparation of the test data?

The generation layer

The definition layer

The execution layer

The adaptation layer

10. You have implemented a keyword-driven scripting framework, which uses a test execution tool to run the tests. This has been in use for the past year and all of the teams now use this framework as the standard approach for test execution.

The teams all work on different aspects of the SUT and they have all experienced significant benefits in the use of this scripting framework. However, on closer examination, you have discovered that there are numerous instances where the teams have the same functionality to test but are using different keywords.

One of your objectives for improvement is to create consistency among the teams.

What is the BEST way to handle this situation?

Move to a model-based approach to scripting where the models include the keywords.

Do nothing, each team are working in isolation and they are all experiencing significant benefits in the way they are currently working.

Provide each team with a set of guidelines and naming conventions for keywords.

Create a central library of keywords and associated definitions for each team to use.

Page 2 of 3

11. If model-based testing has been selected for the overall test automation approach for a project, how does that influence the layers of the TAA?

All layers are used, but the test generation layer will be automated based on the defined model

There will be no need for the execution layer

No adaptation will be needed because the interfaces will be defined by the model

There will be no need to design the tests for the API because those will be covered by the model

12. You are using a gTAA to create a TAS for a project. The TAS is aimed at automatically and executing test cases based on a use-case Modeling approaching that uses UML as a modeling language. All the interaction between TAS and SUT will only be at the API and GUI level.

Which of the following components of the gTAA would you EXCLUDE from the TAS?

The test reporting component of the test execution layer.

The Test execution component of the test generation layer

The test execution (test engine of the test execution layer

The Command Line Interface (CLI) component of the test adaptation layer

13. As a TAE you are evaluating a functional test automation tool that will be for several projects within your organization. The projects require that tool to work effectively and efficiently with SUT’s in distributed environments. The test automated tool also needs to interface with other existing test tools (test management tool and defect tracking tool.) The existing test tools subject to planned updates and their interface to the test automated tool may not work property after these updates.

Which of the following are the two LEAST important concerns related to the evaluation of the test automation in this scenario?

✑ Is the test automation tool able to launch processors and execute test cases on multiple machines in different environments?

✑ Does the test automation tool support a licensing scheme that allows accessing different sets?

✑ Does the test automation tool have a large feature set, but only part of the features will be sets?

✑ Do the release notes for the planned updates on existing specify the impacts on their interfaces to other tools?

Does the test automation tool need to install specific libraries that could impact the SUT?

A and C

A and E

B and E

C and D

14. Consider a SUT that small run on multiple platform during the execution of automated test runs. In each test run an automated test suite needs to be executed, with the same version of the TAF, against the same version of the SUT of each platform. Each platform shall have its own dedicated test environment. Your goal is to implement a process as automated as possible ( i.e with minimal manual intervention) that allows implementing a consistent setup of the TAS across the multiple test environments.

Which two of the following aspects are MOST relevant for achieving your goal in this scenario?

✑ The configuration of the TAS uses automated installation scripts

✑ The TAF saves the logs needed to debug errors in XML format

A) Features of the TAF not used by the automated tests have been tested

B) All the automated test cases contain the expected results

C) The TAS components are under configuration management

A and e

B and c

B and d

A and d

15. Which of the following describes how a test execution report is likely to be used?

To understand which test step caused the failure in a test case

To identify problematic areas of the SUT by keeping a history showing which test cases fail the most

To measure coverage of the test basis by a test suite

To record how a test case failure has been fixed

16. You are currently designing the TAA of a TAS. You have been asked to adopt an approach for automatically generating and executing test cases from a model that defines the SUT. The SUT is a state-based and event-driven that is described by a finite-state machine and exposes its functionality via an API. The behavior of the SUT depends on hardware and communication links that can be unreliable.

Which of the following aspects is MOST important when designing the TAA in this scenario?

Looking for tools that allows direct denoting of exceptions and actions depending on the SUT events.

Adopting a test definition strategy based on classification tree coverage for the test definition layer.

Looking for tools that allow performing setup and teardown of the test suites and the SU

Adopting a test definition strategy based on use case/exception case coverage for the definition layer.

17. What are the four horizontal layers of the gTAA?

Test adaptation, test execution, test design, test definition

Test generation, test execution, test definition, test APIs

Test generation, test definition, test execution, test adaptation

Test definition, test execution, test reporting, test adaptation

18. Consider the following layers of the gTAA structure:

a. Test generation layer

b. Test definition layer

c. Test execution layer

d. Test execution layer

Consider the following capabilities associated with these layers.

Acquire all the necessary resources before each test and release all after run, in order to avoid interdependences between test Allow the automated test scripts on an abstract level to interact with components, configurations and interfaces of the SUT.

Design test directives that allow configuring the algorithms used to automatically produce the test cases a given model of the SUT.

Allow the definition and implementation of test cases and data by means of templates and/or guidelines.

Which of the following BEST matches each layer with the appropriate capability?

a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2

a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2

a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1

a-3, b-4, c-2, d-1

19. You are evaluating several test modelling tools and are wanting to automatically generate test cases within the tool where many different combinations of input data are created.

You are then wanting to export the test cases into a csv file which can then be read by a functional test execution tool using a data-driven or keyword-driven scripting method.

You have investigated several tools and there is only one tool that provides all the necessary features defined by your team with the exception of the export facility. It does not provide an export into either .xls or .csv formats.

What would be the BEST next step regarding the selection of this tool?

Consider another tool that is more “fit for purpose" and has all the features required.

Explore the possibility of creating your own export facility.

Ask the vendor and use forums to see if a solution is available or going to be available in the future.

Purchase this tool and generate the .csv file manually.

20. The GUI of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) application has been delivered through internet Explorer with proprietary Active X and Java controls. This implementation enables rich client capabilities, but specific commercial automation tools are necessary to automate test cases at GUI of functional test cases. This is to demonstrate whether a small set of the commercial are able to properly recognize actions taken by a tester when interacting with GUI of the CRM application.

Which of the following scripting techniques would be MOST suitable in this scenario?

Data-driven scripting

Keyword-driven scripting

Linear scripting

Structure scripting

Page 3 of 3

21. You have inherited a TAS that is working well it uses keyword-driven scripting and was well architected. The automation architect who built the system has now moved on to another company. The TAS is working across several projects and has a multiple library of keywords, categorised by project. The individual project teams maintain these keyword scripts.

Based only on the given information, what is the MOST significant risk for the TAS?

The keyword driven scripts may become out of date if not maintained

The level of abstraction, coupled with the departure of the architect may make the system hard to maintain

New projects may not work as well with the TAS as the current projects

Because the keyword scripts are maintained by different teams, there is a likelihood that good coding standards are not followed

22. Designing the System Under Test (SUT) for testability is important for a good test automation approach and can also benefit manual test execution.

Which of the following is NOT a consideration when designing for testability?

Observability: The SUT needs to provide interface that give insight into the system.

Re-useability: The code written for the SUT must be re-useable for other similar system.

Clearly defined architecture: The SUT Architecture needs to provide clear and understandable interfaces giving control and visibility on all test levels.

Control: the SUT needs to provide interfaces that can be used to perform actions on SU

23. You are planning the pilot for an in-house developed Test Automation solution (TAS).

Which two of the following would be important steps to take as part of the planning process?

a) Review your organisation's current projects and identify which one would be most suitable to pilot the TAS.

b) Ensure that the developers will provide the necessary commitment for the TAS deployment activities.

c) Run a series of training workshops for new users of the TAS before they are asked to use it.

d) Develop a project plan for the pilot and reserve the necessary budget and resources for its implementation.

e) Ask the developers to provide any missing functionality during the deployment activities.

a and b

b and d

c and d

c and e

24. Your functional regression test automation suite ran successfully for the first two sprints and no failures were encountered during the runs. The automation suite records the status of each test case as either 'pass' or 'fail' and has excellent recovery capability built in.

For the third sprint, the TAS log reported several test cases with a status of 'fail'. You investigated each test case and found that most failures were due to a defect in one of the keyword scripts, rather than in the SUT. For those where the failure was in the SUT, defectreports were raised but several were returned by the developers asking for more information to enable them to reproduce the problem.

Which additional log items SHOULD you add to the TAS that would BEST improve failure analysis and defect reporting for future sprints?

a) Dynamic measurement information about the SUT.

b) A status of TAS error’, in additional to pass' and 'fail', for each test case.

c) Use of a colour coding scheme so that 'pass’ is in red and fail' is in green.

d) A counter to determine how many times each test case has been executed.

e) System configuration information including software/firmware and operating system versions.

f) A copy of the source code for all Keyword scripts executed.

a and b

d and e

a and c

b and e

25. A web application was released into production one year ago, it has regular release which follow a V-model lifecycle and testing is well-established and fully integration into the development lifecycle. You have been asked to implement a TAS for the regression test suite. The regression tests have been developed via the GUI and are expected to be run at least four times a month, for each planned release, for the whole operation solution life of the system (six years). Each screen of the GUI uses several third-party controls which are not compatible with the existing automation solutions. The environment for the automation will be stable, fully controllable and separated from other environments (development, staging, production).

What could be the MOST problematic for this TAS?

Maturity of the test process

Complexity to automate

Frequency of use

Sustainability of the automated environment

Pass Your ISTQB Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) Exam with Latest CT-TAE Exam Materials